Early mixing consoles had quadrant faders instead of the linear faders of today. Do they just look pleasantly retro, or do they have advantages we have now lost?
Follow RecordProducer.com on Twitter...
You have to admit, the linear fader is a brilliant invention. You can control levels easily, judge how much you are changing the level just by feel, change multiple channels by the same amount, and get a visual indication of relative levels. That's a powerful package, and a good reason why we still use a visual representation of physical faders in software recording systems.
So what did recording engineers use before faders were invented? Well in the earliest days there were rotary controls, like you find elsewhere on the mixing console and on outboard equipment. And even before that there were rotary controls that were actually multi-position switches - they did not operate continuously like potentiometers.
But the disadvantage of rotary controls is that you have to look at the indicator to see what position they are in. And you can't do any of the things listed among the advantages of faders.
The next stage of development of level control was a kind of halfway house - a rotary control, but with its axis shifted 90 degrees. This gives us the quadrant fader.
Now if you are into retro gear, then doubtless you will find the look of the quadrant fader very appealing. But there is more to it than that...
Quadrant faders actually have one significant advantage over linear faders. Now what could that be...?
OK, here's a test. Sit in front of your mixing console and close your eyes. Reach out for a fader. Now tell me what position it is in. 0 dB? +10 dB? -30 dB?
You don't know, do you?
But with a quadrant fader, you can actually feel the position it is in without having to look. With mixing being such an aural experience, anything that releases the brain from high-intensity visual tasks just has to be good.
Maybe that's why some of those old recordings sound so great.
Now, if only someone could work out how to emulate a quadrant fader in software...
Publication date Tuesday March 30, 2010
Discussion on this article's topic...
Monday March 29, 2010
UPDATE - Posting of comments has been disabled. RecordProducer.com has been targeted by a botnet posting spam comments. The facility to post comments will return when this problem has been resolved.
We welcome your addition to the discussion on the topic of this article. If you feel that the article is inaccurate in any way, please let us know by e-mail at . We read all messages sent to this address but we cannot promise a reply.
![]() |
Apple's launch of the iPad has created a whole new segment in computing. Should musicians rejoice? Or be very afraid? Read more... |
![]() |
Do music business lawyers always know what they are doing? Or could they ask you to sign a contract that would not stand up in court? Read more... |
![]() |
You've got your recordings in hand, you've done your networking and have finally made contact with that one industry professional that can help you launch your career... then here it comes, "I need you to send me your multitrack files so I can remix it." Now what do you do to make that happen? Read more... |
![]() |
Do your recordings have warmth? Yes? But does the amount of warmth vary with the signal level? Wouldn't you like it to be more consistent... Read more... |
![]() |
Auto-Tune is a powerful vocal tuning software. It can turn an out-of-tune vocal track into a pitch-perfect pro performance. But are there times when you would be better off not using it? Read more... |
![]() |
If you have a studio business, doubtless you want it to continue for decades to come. But if you don't understand the client life cycle then you'll soon be in trouble. Read more... |
![]() |
Everyone knows that you should compress the snare and kick drum. But why should you do it, and how should you do it? Read more... |
![]() |
Whoever invented this stupid terminology should be force fed with Brussels sprouts for a fortnight. Even the 'experts' can get it wrong. Read more... |
![]() |
You've tried all the usual microphones and are tired of their sound? Why not try something that is really over the edge... Read more... |
![]() |
We're organising a mass protest against the Larrikin Music vs. Men At Work court decision. Join now and the kookaburra may not have the last laugh. Read more... |
![]() |
Popular music is here today, gone tomorrow. Each new recording gets more and more stale as time goes by, where classical music can always remain fresh and new. Read more... |
![]() |
It's exciting for a school to have a music recording studio installed. But getting it working and keeping it working are often two very different things. Read more... |
![]() |
It's a topic of endless debate, but really there is no way a stream of digits can beat the real vinyl experience. Read more... |
![]() |
It's not every day we get a new Prime Minister in the UK. And for a Prime Minister to talk directly to RecordProducer.com, well that must be really special! Read more... |
![]() |
It's an old cliche of rock music that the bass guitarist should be close to the drummer. But with modern technology does this still matter? And will you indeed go deaf? Read more... |
![]() |
Record Producer Steve Lyon gives a taste of what it is like to work with Glyn Johns's simple drum miking techniques and explains why metal sheets were once brought into the studio. Read more... |
![]() |
A record label specializing in high quality audio charges $$$ for its tracks. But will you get good value for your money? Read more... |
![]() |
All live sound mixing consoles have pan controls. But there are very good reasons not to use them. Not if you respect your audience, that is. Read more... |
![]() |
Some things about Apple's iPad are great. Some things are, er, missing. But how useful is it in the studio right now? Read more... |
![]() |
So your band has a website. That is so 2009! Why not get the new decade started with an iPhone app that showcases your talent to the (iPhone) world? Read more... |