How do you record a singer with poor microphone technique?
You're trying to get a decent recording, but your singer is doing really strange things with the microphone. What do you do?
Follow RecordProducer.com on Twitter...
I don't know where singers learn microphone technique. Most singers in popular music don't have any training, so they can only have picked it up from seeing other people do it, or in response to what they hear coming through the speakers at their live gigs.
The 'classic' microphone technique is to back away from the mic when singing loud, coming in closer when singing quietly.
This does work in live performance, particularly in smaller venues where the sound is often less well-controlled than at top pro gigs.
The alternative is for loud sections to be either ear-splitting or distorted, or for quiet sections to be inaudible to the audience.
Of course a compressor can be used, but this creates other problems in live performance that we won't go into here.
In the studio however, things are a little different.
Firstly, there is no problem in setting exactly the right preamp gain to capture the loudest sections of the vocal without distortion. There is never any reason to back away from the mic due to excessive level. (And if the mic can't take it, use one that can.)
Now if the quiet sections of the vocal are too quiet, they can be brought up in level using fader automation. You will probably be using a compressor that will do some of this work anyway.
So there is no reason why the singer has to be anything other than a constant distance from the mic.
And in fact, if the singer does bob backwards and forwards, it creates a problem. When you use a microphone close up, the sound quality it produces changes significantly even with slight changes in distance. This is particularly so with directional mics, which exhibit the proximity effect where bass rises when the sound source is close to the mic.
Randomly variable level, bass and sound quality is most definitely an engineer's nightmare. It could take a day to put right, and even then not perfectly.
So in general, it is better in the studio for the singer to stay at a constant distance from the mic.
There is however an exception...
Sometimes it is desirable to let the singer react to what they hear in the headphones. Some experienced singers have the ability to 'work' the mic to get a more expressive performance.
In this case, you should make sure the singer has exactly the headphone sound they want, with EQ, compression and reverb as required. Then let them use their microphone technique as they wish.
If anyone has any particularly good or bad experiences of microphone technique, we would love to hear. Discussion below...
Publication date Monday February 01, 2010
Enter your e-mail address to receive notifications of new comments on this topic...
(You can unsubscribe quickly and easily.)
(You can unsubscribe quickly and easily.)
Discussion on this article's topic...
Simon Wood, Uk
That girls Mic technique looks fantastic and I wouldn't be wasting any time discussing it with her, I would get straight to the dinner plans! she's hot (i don't get let out of the studio much)
One technique I like to use is to get the singer to record his/her quiet parts first and miss out the loud parts (normally sectioned together in the chorus anyway) then adjust positioning for the loud parts and record those. This helps to stop them moving about.
One technique I like to use is to get the singer to record his/her quiet parts first and miss out the loud parts (normally sectioned together in the chorus anyway) then adjust positioning for the loud parts and record those. This helps to stop them moving about.
Thursday June 10, 2010
Mario, The Hague, Netherlands
Hi, a trick that "does it" sometimes when a singer has poort microphone technique: I give the singer a handheld microphone -say a Shure SM58-, and place a Neumann TLM-103 on a distance of about 40 to 50 cm. I tell him he can sing in the Shure any way he wants as long as he sings in the direction of the TLM. That way I can also give him the one or the other signal -or a mix- on his headphone. And after recording I (we) choose which of the (mix of) recordings we use. Works fine! A problem arises whe the singer moves around and away from the TLM a lot. Then a very small singing-booth might do :-)
Friday February 12, 2010
Caleb Mwanjoka, Mbeya, Tanzania
Actually, mic techiniques is big problem to many singers.
Friday February 12, 2010
Mario, The Hague, Netherlands
@Stefan: Hi Stefan, thanks for your reply and ideas (I understand the term "stamp" now). You are right: with a lot of effort/hours some changes might be made, but this concerns recordings of 11 songs, with 2 mikes picking up the voice and the guitar on both mikes at the same time (I used large-membranes) from a singer/songwriter that paid a fixed price. So if he wants to pay for the additional costs/hours I might give it a try at the worst points in the wavecycles.
I will inform him about his breathing problem, for his own benefit in the future. Thanks again! Greetings from Mario
I will inform him about his breathing problem, for his own benefit in the future. Thanks again! Greetings from Mario
Tuesday February 09, 2010
Stefan, Cologne, Germany
...and, sorry for not getting it done in one comment, you can treat every affected track on its own or just edit after mixing, results should be quite similar.
Tuesday February 09, 2010
Stefan, Cologne, Germany
...and that strange word should have been 'wavecycles'
Tuesday February 09, 2010
Stefan, Cologne, Germany
I 'borrowed' the term from the stamp tool in Photoshop. In case you are not familiar with it - the principle is to cover small unwanted areas in your file by copying similar (and clean!) parts from the same file and pasting them 'on top' of the noise. Let's say your musician plays the same chord twice in a row, snorting while playing the first, you could sample the second chord and paste it over the first. If it's a very short noise, you might find something useable in the very same decay period of guitar notes played (you could even create a loop from only a few clean wavecayles). Just be careful to fit the sample in the surrounding area tightly - you can take care of abrupt volume changes using automation and/or short crossfades.
Tuesday February 09, 2010
Mario, The Hague, The Netherlands
@ Stefan, Cologne, Germany:
Hi Stefan,
Could you be more precise about 'stamping out'? I don't get what you mean (might be my poor knowledge of English or studio-terminology). The way I understand you, I would have to stamp out the part in both the guitar and the voice tracks, due to the snorts being in both tracks? (read my first post).
Hi Stefan,
Could you be more precise about 'stamping out'? I don't get what you mean (might be my poor knowledge of English or studio-terminology). The way I understand you, I would have to stamp out the part in both the guitar and the voice tracks, due to the snorts being in both tracks? (read my first post).
Monday February 01, 2010
Stefan, Cologne, Germany
Concerning Mario's snorter:
Another way is to 'stamp out' the undesired bits by copying a clean sample of the length of the snort right over it. Some volume automation will be necessary to stay close to the original decay. Quite a hassle, but sometimes worth the effort.
Another way is to 'stamp out' the undesired bits by copying a clean sample of the length of the snort right over it. Some volume automation will be necessary to stay close to the original decay. Quite a hassle, but sometimes worth the effort.
Monday February 01, 2010
Mazzika, Cairo , Egypt
Thanks for emailing me with this good knowlage
Sunday January 31, 2010
Esaú Bravo, Morelia, Michoacán, México
P. D. (from Esaú Bravo)
By the way, everybody can built a "pop anti pop filter" employing an used pantyhose, tightly stretched around a solid circle; as an example, I used the circle that my grandmother utilize for embroider or spin; but that is not the only possible manner, you can use, even the bottom of a solid bottle or a big metalic can (10 cm diameter or more).
The only recomendation is that you must use the double "layer" of the pantyhose, wich must be tightly stretched, as I previously said.
By the way, everybody can built a "pop anti pop filter" employing an used pantyhose, tightly stretched around a solid circle; as an example, I used the circle that my grandmother utilize for embroider or spin; but that is not the only possible manner, you can use, even the bottom of a solid bottle or a big metalic can (10 cm diameter or more).
The only recomendation is that you must use the double "layer" of the pantyhose, wich must be tightly stretched, as I previously said.
Saturday January 30, 2010
Esaú Bravo, Morelia, Michoacán, México
I believe that the problem of the random distance, can be easily solved, if you use the "pop anti pop screen", as a constant reference for the singer; he or she, literally must put his or her lips in near contact with the screen; without exageration and in such manner, that the "light" contact, does not affect the right pronuntiation.
Saturday January 30, 2010
Mario Walzberg, The Hague, The Netherlands
Hi all,
Thanks for all your replies and advise! I used a popfilter during recording, I can't spend the money for Melodyne DNA at the moment (didn't know it is for sale yet?), I am giving it one last try by searching for the "exact" snort-freq. And I will indeed, tell the singer about his breathing problem. I spend enough time on this one guy for now. Thanks again to all of you!
Nice to get all your serious advice. Greetings, Mario
Thanks for all your replies and advise! I used a popfilter during recording, I can't spend the money for Melodyne DNA at the moment (didn't know it is for sale yet?), I am giving it one last try by searching for the "exact" snort-freq. And I will indeed, tell the singer about his breathing problem. I spend enough time on this one guy for now. Thanks again to all of you!
Nice to get all your serious advice. Greetings, Mario
Tuesday January 26, 2010
Robert, Columbia, USA
first of all someone needs to talk to the singer about better breathing tech. once that has been taken care of then we go back and try it again. try a pop filter also and see how much that helps. that will filter some out and will help keep them from getting to close to the mic. they really need to learn breath control. bring a vocal coach. he may be insulted but that is what he needs. if he does it in the studio then he is also doing it live and i would not pay to set through one of his concerts and listen to that.
Tuesday January 26, 2010
Djhopkins
@Mario Walzberg, Find melodyne DNA, it can separate every single note in the song. Hope the snort is not the same note as any other noth at that sample.
Tuesday January 26, 2010
Anonymous
To give a little help, i had a friend of mine do this to a singer that would sometimes clap, and some parts could no be edited out. He made a new track, found a clap he could cut out, put it in the new track and phase inversed it. Them went about placeing it all over the new track wherever there was a clap he could not cut out, it doesnt clear it up complete, but in a mix its barely audible. Hope this helps
Monday January 25, 2010
Mario Walzberg, The Hague, The Netherlands
Hi Drew,
Haha :-)
Thanks for your medical advice :-)
But now seriously: Ofcourse I advised him to record guitar and voice on seperate tracks, but he just couldn't. And unfortunately this singer/songwriter has no opportunity to re-record. So that's why I'm looking for a (technical) way to do the edits on the tracks I have now.
Anyone (else)? Or is it just impossible to do this?
Greetings,
Mario Walzberg, StudiOjo
Haha :-)
Thanks for your medical advice :-)
But now seriously: Ofcourse I advised him to record guitar and voice on seperate tracks, but he just couldn't. And unfortunately this singer/songwriter has no opportunity to re-record. So that's why I'm looking for a (technical) way to do the edits on the tracks I have now.
Anyone (else)? Or is it just impossible to do this?
Greetings,
Mario Walzberg, StudiOjo
Monday January 25, 2010
Drew, Kc, M
I recommend a good decongestant... LOL
I would retrack the vox separately, then you can edit out the snorting from the new track, thus burying the snorts on guitar tracks, at least somewhat..
better yet record guitar and vox separately
I would retrack the vox separately, then you can edit out the snorting from the new track, thus burying the snorts on guitar tracks, at least somewhat..
better yet record guitar and vox separately
Monday January 25, 2010
Mario Walzberg, The Hague, The Netherlands, Holland
Imagine this: You recorded a singer (with a Neumann TLM103) that simultaniously playes an acoustic western guitar (recorded with 2x Neumann KM84). One mic caught a lot of signal of the other and vice versa. Now with that you can 'deal' to a certain instance.
But here's the problem: The singer, while breating in, every time makes a sort of snorting sound (actually it's a bit like a sound a little piggy makes), always of short durance, but always very audible. By reducing the volume a little in both guitar and voice tracks on those short parts in the recording, you always influence the guitar's natural sustain, so ending up with a very unnatural result.
Now here's The Question: How do I minimize the snorting sounds, while (almost) not influencing the natural guitar sustain. I already tried toying around with for instance compression and EQ, but the snorts seem to be TOO present to "isolate" and edit, without negatively influencing the guitar's sustain and the overall-sound.
Any suggestions?
Thanks!
Mario Walzberg, StudiOjo
(Excuse my poor Ingleesh, it's not my native language :-)
But here's the problem: The singer, while breating in, every time makes a sort of snorting sound (actually it's a bit like a sound a little piggy makes), always of short durance, but always very audible. By reducing the volume a little in both guitar and voice tracks on those short parts in the recording, you always influence the guitar's natural sustain, so ending up with a very unnatural result.
Now here's The Question: How do I minimize the snorting sounds, while (almost) not influencing the natural guitar sustain. I already tried toying around with for instance compression and EQ, but the snorts seem to be TOO present to "isolate" and edit, without negatively influencing the guitar's sustain and the overall-sound.
Any suggestions?
Thanks!
Mario Walzberg, StudiOjo
(Excuse my poor Ingleesh, it's not my native language :-)
Monday January 25, 2010
Drew, Kc, Mo
I do a lot of live sound and laugh ( and cry) over the "techniques " vocalists use these days my favorite is the: wrap the cord around the hand 4 or 5 times, real tight, pull it tight into the jack,( I think this is to "force the sound out the cable????") then cup the entire ball of a 58 with both hands and scream between the thumbs... causing extreme feedback, then complain about the monitors... and the mic is left disgustingly wet and covered with food particles....
TOTAL professionalism
TOTAL professionalism
Monday January 25, 2010
Bill Bromfield, Stephens City, Va, USA
I like to use two or three mics, one close to the face, the other(s) further away.
Monday January 25, 2010
UPDATE - Posting of comments has been disabled. RecordProducer.com has been targeted by a botnet posting spam comments. The facility to post comments will return when this problem has been resolved.
We welcome your addition to the discussion on the topic of this article. If you feel that the article is inaccurate in any way, please let us know by e-mail at . We read all messages sent to this address but we cannot promise a reply.
 |
What will happen if you use an uncleared sample on your recording? Can you sample legally if your use is only private? Is it safe to use samples you find on the Internet? Read more... |
 |
A RecordProducer.com visitor asks whether a good analog-to-digital converter is necessary. Or will any old converter do? Read more... |
 |
Popular music is here today, gone tomorrow. Each new recording gets more and more stale as time goes by, where classical music can always remain fresh and new. Read more... |
 |
Are you guilty of recording cliches? Do you do things because you've seen other people doing it like that? Or do you decide for yourself what's best? Read more... |
 |
Go to a piano teacher and they will tell you to practice every day. But the one thing they hardly ever tell you is *how* to practice. But the cure for 'wrongnoteitis' might be simpler than you think. Read more... |
 |
Do music business lawyers always know what they are doing? Or could they ask you to sign a contract that would not stand up in court? Read more... |
 |
Everyone should build a loudspeaker at least once in their life. But for this would-be loudspeaker builder, their first attempt was something of a disaster... Read more... |
 |
An RP reader asks whether freezing tracks that use plug-ins is bad for your hard disk? Would it be better to bounce them? Read more... |
 |
Early mixing consoles had quadrant faders instead of the linear faders of today. Do they just look pleasantly retro, or do they have advantages we have now lost? Read more... |
 |
You're watching a live music show on TV, but something doesn't seem right. Should live music be live? Or should we just expect it to be fake? Read more... |
 |
Record Producer Steve Lyon gives a taste of what it is like to work with Glyn Johns's simple drum miking techniques and explains why metal sheets were once brought into the studio. Read more... |
 |
This YouTube video has a slight problem with the sound - the gain is set far too high and the sound is horribly clipped. Read more... |
 |
Amplifiers can be either symmetrical or asymmetrical. A symmetrical amplifier has both positive and negative power supply rails and the signal rises and falls centered on the 0 volts point exactly in between. An asymmetrical amplifier has only one power supply rail and the signal is biased to a voltage midway between zero volts and the power supply voltage... Read more... |
 |
An RP visitor enquires whether the Genelec 8240A with digital inputs and DSP is suitable for the home recording studio. Hmm... Read more... |
 |
Anyone still using pre-2005 software? Pre-2000?? Pre-1995??? Can anyone go back even further than that? Read more... |
 |
Do you still use DAT? CD recorders? Outboard effects units? Come on and admit it - you're a dinosaur! Read more... |
 |
Leaving aside questions of color and pattern, what type of carpet works best in a recording studio environment? Read more... |
 |
The microphone used by Dusty Springfield on many of her hit records is up for sale. Vintage tube AKG C12 microphones don't come up for sale very often. This could be your big chance! Read more... |
 |
Still struggling to get a good sound in your home recording studio? Perhaps a visit to a pro studio would fix all your problems. Read more... |
 |
It's an old cliche of rock music that the bass guitarist should be close to the drummer. But with modern technology does this still matter? And will you indeed go deaf? Read more... |
You Could Be Making PRO Recordings In Your Home Recording Studio...
Music Production and Sound Engineering Online Course.
Turn your home recordings into
PRO recordings in just 12 weeks.
Sign up now for the FREE COURSE TOUR!
Pro Engineer School Vol. 2
Take your engineering to the next stage. Learn how to operate the mighty SSL SL9000 J-Series mixing console. Learn about dynamics, effects, mixing and more. Vol. 2. Pro Engineer School Vol. 2
Equipping Your Home Recording Studio
Choose the right equipment, and you can make pro-quality recordings right from the start - even with a basic setup. Choose the wrong equipment and you may spend years sorting out a studio setup that is right for you. And all the time you spend doing that, you could have been recording. Equipping Your Home Recording Studio
The Joe Clancy Drum Recordings at Abbey Road Studio 3
See and hear five important drum recording microphone configurations at Abbey Road Studio 3. Includes 'Studio Master' audio files and a video of the entire session. Includes the famous 'Glyn Johns' 4-mic technique - not to be missed. The Joe Clancy Drum Recordings at Abbey Road Studio 3
The Guy Barzily Microphone Test at Abbey Road Studio 2
Hear ten PRO microphones on male vocal, recorded in studio master quality at Abbey Road Studio 2. The tests include the ultra-classic RCA 44BX 'Elvis' ribbon mic, the equally classic AKG C12 vintage tube, plus eight other mics you NEED to know. PLUS video recordings of all of the tests in this Multimedia Set™. Mic list: AEA A440, AEA R84, AKG C12, Beyerdynamic M160, Blue Baby Bottle, Bruel & Kjaer (DPA) 4011, Neumann U47, RCA 44BX, STC (Coles) 4038, Violet Design Flamingo The Guy Barzily Microphone Test at Abbey Road Studio 2
Electric Guitar Recording Techniques
Hear and see electric guitar recording techniques in this AUDIO and VIDEO Multimedia Set™. Recorded in Abbey Road Studio 3, this Multimedia Set™ features eleven techniques that you can experience in video, or load into your digital audio workstation and mix yourself. Electric Guitar Recording Techniques
Piano Recording Techniques
Seven grand piano recording techniques and eighteen microphone positions clearly demonstrated in 'Studio Master Quality' audio, together with downloadable videos of the entire session, recorded in Abbey Road Studio 3. See and hear for yourself classic piano microphone techniques and positions - select the combination that YOU like best for your next piano recording project. Piano Recording Techniques
The Niccie Simpson Microphone Test at Abbey Road Studio 2
Hear ten PRO microphones on male vocal, recorded in studio master quality at Abbey Road Studio 2. The tests include the ultra-classic RCA 44BX 'Elvis' ribbon mic, the equally classic AKG C12 vintage tube, plus eight other mics you NEED to know. PLUS video recordings of all of the tests in this Multimedia Set™. Mic list: ADK Hamburg, AEA A440, Audio Technica AT4050, Bruel & Kjaer (DPA) 4011, Neumann U47, sE Electronics 4400a, sE Electronics Gemini II, STC (Coles) 4038, Violet Design Amethyst, Violet Design Globe. The Niccie Simpson Microphone Test at Abbey Road Studio 2
The Nicola Dines Microphone and Preamplifier Test at Abbey Road Studio 2
Three amazing microphones and two amazing preamplifiers tested at Abbey Road Studio 2. This Multimedia Set™ includes the original Studio Master recordings, 48 kHz and AAC versions for easier downloading, videos in both high and medium resolution, and session notes. You will see and hear clearly the differences between the three microphones and two preamplifiers. Also, each preamplifer is demonstrated in two settings, giving further examples of how they can sound. The Nicola Dines Microphone and Preamplifier Test at Abbey Road Studio 2
The Clyde Meredith Microphone Test at Abbey Road Studio 2
Hear ten PRO microphones on male vocal, recorded in studio master quality at Abbey Road Studio 2. The tests include the classic tube Neumann U47, the equally classic STC (Coles) 4038, plus eight other mics you NEED to know. PLUS video recordings of all of the tests in this Multimedia Set™. The Clyde Meredith Microphone Test at Abbey Road Studio 2
Class D Power Amplification
"Class D Power Amplification" starts by explaining how conventional power amplifiers work, including Class A, Class B, Class AB and Class C. It goes on to show how and why Class D power amplifiers are smaller, lighter and more efficient than conventional types. It also goes on to explain Class G and Class H. Essential reading for the live sound engineer. Class D Power Amplification
Four Classic Compressors Compared on Female Vocal
The Fairchild 660, Neve 33609, Teletronix LA-2A and the Universal Audio 1176 - reputedly the best compressors in the world. Hear them all on female vocal recorded at Abbey Road Studio 3. Who knows... The Beatles might have used some of these compressors in their heyday. Audio and video Multimedia Set™. Four Classic Compressors Compared on Female Vocal
Microphone Polar Patterns and Stereo Configurations
Microphone polar patterns and basic stereo configurations are fundamental to audio. Many people have read about them, but few have tested them for themselves. Here, you can hear and see all the basic patterns and stereo configurations recorded at Abbey Road Studio 2. Microphone Polar Patterns and Stereo Configurations
An Introduction to Equalization
"An Introduction to Equalization" shows you the science, technology and art of EQ. From filters through tone controls to full SSL-style console EQ, "An Introduction to Equalization" explains all of the foundation knowledge you need to know. Covers recording studio EQ techniques, and the important differences in live sound. If you don't know the material covered by "An Introduction to Equalization", then you simply don't know EQ. An Introduction to Equalization
Hands On: The Neumann U87 Large-Diaphragm Condenser Microphone
The Neumann U87 is the world's most popular microphone - certainly the most desired. Find out exactly what it's like to get your hands on one and use it to its full potential in Hands On: The Neumann U87 Large-Diaphragm Condenser Microphone Hands On: The Neumann U87 Large-Diaphragm Condenser Microphone
The Charlotte Roel Microphone Test at Abbey Road Studio 3
Hear nine classic and modern microphones on female vocal, recorded in studio master quality at Abbey Road Studio 3. The tests include classic tube Neumann U47 and AKG C12 mics, plus five other amazing mics you NEED to know (some costing as little as $300!). PLUS video recordings of all of the tests. The Charlotte Roel Microphone Test at Abbey Road Studio 3